For a long time lazygit has used the term "custom pager" to refer to
what's really a "diff renderer". A pager is a program that allows you to
view output page by page (hence the name), e.g. less; lazygit's custom
diff renderers are not pagers. It used the term only because the feature
is implemented using git's GIT_PAGER env var, but that's an
implementation detail.
Rename the 'git.pagers' config to 'git.diffRenderers', and restructure
its elements while we're at it to make things clearer:
- Add a 'type' field to explicitly specify which type of diff renderer
it is (the two fundamentally different ones are 'stdinFilter' and
'extDiff').
- Add a third type, 'rawGit', which has an 'args' field that makes it
easy to use 'git --color-words' as a custom renderer
- Unify the old 'pager' and 'externalDiffCommand' fields to a single
'command' field for both types
Existing config files are migrated automatically.
The number of side panels is about to become configurable, so a fixed
count of jump-to-panel keys no longer makes sense: a user who configures
six panels shouldn't be forced to also extend jumpToBlock, and one who
hides a panel shouldn't have to trim it. Drop the count check entirely
(individual keys are still validated) and assign keys to panels
positionally, for as many panels as there are keys. Surplus panels go
without a jump key but remain reachable via the next/previous-panel keys.
This also removes the log.Fatal that the count check guarded against.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This adds the user-facing surface for configuring the side panels: their
order, which ones are visible, and how tabs are grouped into panels. Each
entry is either a single panel name or a list of names sharing one panel
as tabs, mirroring how the Keybinding type accepts a scalar or a sequence;
the JSON schema restricts the names to the known set so editors can offer
completion and catch typos. The default reproduces today's layout exactly.
Validation rejects unknown or duplicated names, and requires the files,
branches, and commits panels to always be present: a lot of code focuses
those directly (e.g. after resolving a conflict or popping a stash), so
allowing them to be hidden would let that code focus a hidden panel.
Nothing reads the option yet; the layout still uses the hard-coded order.
Wiring follows in a later commit so the inert surface (and its generated
docs and schema) can be reviewed on its own.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A pager (GIT_PAGER) formats the diff git produces, while
externalDiffCommand and useExternalDiffGitConfig change how git produces
the diff in the first place. They are different pipeline stages, not
alternatives, so combining them on one entry just pipes one through the
other and produces garbled output (e.g. delta trying to parse
difftastic's side-by-side output as a unified diff). The two external
mechanisms likewise conflict, with the explicit command silently
shadowing the git config one. Treat all three as mutually exclusive and
reject configs that set more than one on the same entry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
CustomCommand.Key and CustomCommandMenuOption.Key are user-configured
keybindings just like the built-in ones. Converting them to the Keybinding type
lets a user assign multiple keys to the same custom command, e.g. `key: [a, b]`,
the same way they would for any other keybinding.
The validator iterates over the elements rather than checking a single string,
the binding registration goes through GetValidatedKeyBindingKeys to register
every alternate, and the existing error messages use .String() so a multi-key
binding renders sensibly.
CustomCommandPrompt.Key (a form field name, not a keybinding) stays a plain
string.
Set the sort order's default from the former foldersFirst to mixed, so this is a
change in behavior. I find this useful because it now matches git's order, so if
you look at the diff of a commit, the TOC at the top has the same order as the
file tree you see when entering the commit.
At the same time, we change the defaults for both of them to "date" (they were
"recency" and "alphabetical", respectively, before). This is the reason we need
to touch so many integration tests. For some of them I decided to adapt the test
assertions to the changed sort order; for others, I added a SetupConfig step to
set the order back to "recency" so that I don't have to change what the test
does (e.g. how many SelectNextItem() calls are needed to get to a certain
branch).
This reverts commit 3af545daf7, reversing
changes made to 629b7ba1b8.
We changed our mind about this and want to provide different options for
achieving the same thing, but with more flexibility.
Stefan Haller
Karl Wikström
anikiforov
oakioandStefan Haller