Pressing `d` on a worktree only ever removed the worktree, leaving its branch
behind even though deleting it too is often what you want. Turn the confirmation
into a menu: "Remove worktree", "Remove worktree and delete branch", and "Remove
worktree and delete local and remote branch". The branch-deleting items come
after the plain removal (they do more harm if picked by accident); both are
greyed out for a detached-HEAD worktree, and the local-and-remote one is also
greyed when the branch has no upstream. The plain menu pick is the confirmation,
so the standalone "remove worktree?" prompt is gone (and its now-dead
translation string with it); the dirty-worktree force prompt and the
unmerged-branch warning still appear when relevant.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Split the actual worktree removal out of the confirmation in Remove into a
non-confirming helper, and give both Remove and Detach an optional `then`
continuation that runs after a successful removal in place of the default
refresh. Upcoming flows need to delete the worktree's branch once the worktree
is out of the way; threading a continuation through (rather than the caller
firing branch deletion independently) keeps it ordered after the git command
that actually frees the branch. No behavior change yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When this was originally introduced, it handled single clicks on a list entry
(treating them similar to a double-click by checking whether the click was on
the selected entry). Arguably it should have been called OnDoubleClick back then
already; but when we later changed it to do actual double-click detection (see
37197b8e9a), we should have renamed the methods.
The worktrees tab now displays the checked-out branch (or detached HEAD
state) for each worktree, making it much easier to see which worktree
holds which branch.
This is useful when you need to "unlock" a branch that's occupied by
another worktree: you can now clearly see which worktrees are on a
branch vs detached, without having to select each one individually.
Also rename the "(main)" label to "(main worktree)" to avoid confusion
with the common "main" branch name, and move it after the branch column.
The universal.confirm keybinding is the wrong one to use for this, we want
universal.goInto instead. They are both bound to "enter" by default, but when
remapping confirm to "y" we don't want to use that for entering worktrees.
This adds a bunch of tooltips to keybindings and updates some keybinding descriptions (i.e. labels).
It's in preparation for displaying more keybindings on-screen (in the bottom right of the screen),
and so due in part to laziness it shortens some descriptions so that we don't need to manage both
a short and long description (for on-screen vs in-menu). Nonetheless I've added a ShortDescription
field for when we do want to have both a short and long description.
You'll notice that some keybindings I deemed unworthy of the options view have longer descriptions,
because I could get away with it.
Something dumb that we're currently doing is expecting list items
to define an ID method which returns a string. We use that when copying
items to clipboard with ctrl+o and when getting a ref name for diffing.
This commit gets us a little deeper into that hole by explicitly requiring
list items to implement that method so that we can easily use the new
helper functions in list_controller_trait.go.
In future we need to just remove the whole ID thing entirely but I'm too
lazy to do that right now.
We want to show an error when the user tries to invoke an action that expects only
a single item to be selected.
We're using the GetDisabledReason field to enforce this (as well as DisabledReason
on menu items).
I've created a ListControllerTrait to store some shared convenience functions for this.
Stefan HallerandClaude Opus 4.8
Ruud KamphuisandStefan Haller
Jesse Duffield
Joel BaranickandJesse Duffield