taskKey is written on the goroutine NewTask spawns, under taskIDMutex, but
GetTaskKey read it without the lock — and the string renders in
tasks_adapter.go call that from the UI thread while a previous task's
goroutine may be writing. A Go string is a two-word value, so a torn read
can pair one string's pointer with another's length and index out of
bounds, not merely return the wrong key.
Take the lock in GetTaskKey, and read the field directly at the one call
site that already holds it.
No test: the failure needs two goroutines to interleave inside a
two-word assignment, which nothing can schedule deterministically.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When a rebase (or multi-commit cherry-pick or revert) stops with a
conflict, it is often useful to look at the diff of the "<-- CONFLICT"
commit to double-check that the conflict resolution matches the diff of
the original commit. To make that easier, select that commit
automatically.
This doesn't change anything, we just pin down the selection behavior
around conflicts; we are going to change that behavior, and these tests
will make it obvious how when they change in the next commit.
When there is a single conflicting file left to be resolved, lazygit
dismisses the conflicted-files-only filter when the file no longer has
conflict markers. However, the selection moved to the top, which is
annoying because very often it is useful to look at that file's
resulting diff once more to confirm that conflicts were resolved
correctly, and finding it again can be cumbersome when there are many
changed files. So keep it selected.
Of course, this only helps for the last (or only) conflicted files; when
there are multiple, a resolved file disappears from the panel until all
are resolved, which makes it hard to double-check the resulting diffs.
Doing it afterwards is not easy because you'd have to remember which
files were conflicting. This needs a different solution, but for the
special case of only a single conflicting file this is already a big
improvement.
When using lazygit in a multi-tab terminal it is useful to see if the
lazygit tab is currently active; ghostty does a very good job at dimming
down the inactive tabs, but VS Code's builtin terminal does not, so
indicate this on our side by removing the green highlight from panel
frames and tab titles, and showing the selection as inactive like we do
for a side panel when the main view is focused.
A terminal that supports focus reporting answers with the state it is
already in when we turn reporting on, so at startup we were told that we
had gained focus that we never lost, and refreshed everything a second
time on top of the refresh that loading the repo had just started. The
two ran at once, each with its own `git status`, which made both of them
slower than the one refresh needed to be.
Keep track of what the reports say, then, and pass on only the ones that
change it. Assuming that we start out focused costs us nothing when we
don't: that same first report says so, so a lazygit started in a window
that isn't in front knows it from the start.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Finding out which of the files are worktrees of ours had its own answer
to where this repo's worktrees are, walking the directory that git keeps
them in. The worktrees panel asks git itself, and that is the better
answer: it is the one git gives for the same question elsewhere in the
app, and it doesn't need to know where git records what.
The model that panel fills is all the files need, so mark them from it.
That takes the work out of the file loader, whose other two callers were
paying for it without wanting it, and it costs no git call at all: both
models are written on the UI thread, so whichever of the two refreshes
lands second marks the files against the other's fresh data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
We show this with a worktree icon (which is only shown when nerd fonts
are used, so turn these on), but also we strip the trailing `/` that
"git status" reports, so that it shows as a file rather than a directory
with a bogus file in it.
The reason for adding the test is that we are going to touch the logic
that determines whether an item in the Files panel is a linked worktree,
and this guards against regressing.
The worktrees were loaded and written by the branches refresh whenever
both were in scope, because the branches view shows worktrees against
branches: refreshing them separately rendered that view twice, once
with worktrees that were still stale.
Ordering the two is enough for that, and it leaves each scope owning
its own model again. The worktrees refresh now runs first and queues
its model write before it reports being done, so a branches refresh
that waits for it queues its own write behind that one, and renders
once with both. The worktrees scope only renders the branches view
itself when nobody else is going to.
As a side effect the two loads now run concurrently, where the branches
refresh used to load the worktrees after its own branches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Everything in performRefresh is meant to read as "if this scope was
asked for, refresh it", with the scopes that always change together
expanded into each other up front so that each check can name a single
one. The commits and the branches were the exception: one condition
asking for either of them refreshed both, so what that block does only
followed from reading it together with the expansion at the top of the
function. The rebase commits hung off the same condition as an else,
even though it is the commits refresh they are an alternative to.
Expand those two into each other like the other pairs, and give each of
them a check of its own. They now capture their inputs separately,
which is what every other scope has always done.
The reflog stays with the branches rather than getting a check of its
own, because sorting the branches by recency needs it loaded first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
It's overkill for most purposes, but I'd say it doesn't hurt to have the
extra resolution available in the raw JSON data for the few cases where
it's useful. Have "lazygit -l" print them with milli-second resolution;
that seems to be a good middle ground.
Besides the misleading error about submodules, the command crashes when
it runs before the first files refresh has come in: the file tree
doesn't exist yet at that point, and staging all of a tree that isn't
there dereferences a nil root node. That is easy to hit in a big repo,
where `git status` takes a moment while the panel sits there empty.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The stage-all command acts on the whole file tree, and nothing stops it
from doing that when the tree is empty. It ends up in the branch that
explains why a submodule couldn't be staged, which has nothing to do
with what the user did.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every one of these did by hand what focusing the list now does on its
own: five hand-added scroll requests, and four origin resets that paired
a "select the first item" with a "and show the top of the list".
The scroll that the commits refresh performed when it found the selected
commit at a new index goes too. It is now unconditional for a foreground
refresh, and deliberately absent for a background one: when an agent
commits in another window, we would rather see the new commits arrive
than have the view yank itself back to the commit we had selected.
The one origin reset that stays is the one in ReApplyFilter, which runs
as part of a refresh and so can't rely on the refresh scrolling.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ever since scrolling the selection into view became opt-in, we have been
fixing the same class of regression by hand, five times so far: a
controller moves the selection somewhere new, doesn't say that it wants
the view to follow, and the selection ends up off screen. The decision
needs facts from two places — whether the selection went somewhere new is
known to the list, whether the scroll position is the caller's to manage
is known to the caller — and asking every caller for both is what keeps
going wrong. The callers that get it wrong are usually not even the ones
that moved the selection: they are pass-throughs like postRefreshUpdate,
which can't know what a refresh did to the selection.
So default to scrolling, and let the two callers that maintain the scroll
position themselves say so.
The one case where scrolling is always wrong is a refresh that no user
action is behind: a background poll, or a reload of state on window
focus, after a subprocess, or after a repo switch. Those must leave the
viewport wherever the user last scrolled it to — that is what made the
scrolling opt-in in the first place. Both are already marked in
RefreshOptions, so the refresh can decide it once, centrally, instead of
each caller judging it.
A user action that ends in a foreground refresh does now yank the view
back to the selection if the user had scrolled away from it. That's a
behaviour change, and there may be actions where it turns out to be
unwelcome; those we can fix individually, and it beats the ones that
don't scroll today.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Since scrolling the selection into view became opt-in, five places have
had to be fixed by hand after the fact, none of them with a test. Cover
them now: making the scrolling automatic has to keep all five working,
and once it does, the hand-added scroll calls can go.
Two of them assert that the selection is visible rather than on an exact
scroll position, because the panel they look at changes height along the
way (filtering mode switches to half screen), or because what matters is
only that the commit we jumped to can be seen.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This is the other place that manages its own scroll position: while a
drag extends the selection to a line below the viewport, the view stays
put, and the drag autoscroller scrolls it one line at a time for as long
as the pointer stays there. Making the scroll automatic would centre the
selection instead, i.e. jump the view rather than scroll it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The one behaviour that made scrolling the selection into view opt-in in
the first place — a background refresh must not yank the view back to a
selection the user scrolled away from — has never been covered by a test.
It's about to become the one case that the automatic scrolling has to
suppress, so cover it first.
Getting there needs two things from the test harness: mouse wheel events,
which are the only way to scroll a list panel without moving the
selection, and a way to trigger a background refresh. The periodic
routine that issues it is turned off in tests, and turning it on would
mean waiting for its timer and hoping it fires while we're looking, so
drive the refresh directly instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
We are about to make list panels scroll their selection into view
automatically. Page up and down are one of the few places that manage
the scroll position themselves, keeping the selection at the edge of the
viewport rather than in its middle, and nothing covers that today.
Asserting on it needs an exact scroll position assertion; only
OriginYAtLeast existed so far.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
go-gh reads gh's config file once per process and answers from that
snapshot for the rest of the process's life. gh rewrites the file
whenever the active account changes, and stores the active account's
token either in it or in the system keyring, depending on the account.
A lazygit that has been running for a while therefore consults a
snapshot that no longer describes reality: it either keeps using a
token for an account that is no longer active, or, when the snapshot
was taken while a keyring-backed account was active, finds no token at
all and silently stops showing pull requests until it is restarted.
Asking gh resolves the token afresh on every refresh, from whichever of
the environment, the keyring or the config file currently holds it.
go-gh's lookup stays behind as a fallback for setups without the gh
binary, where it still picks up GH_TOKEN and friends.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Quitting with confirmOnQuit set hung for three seconds and printed
"cannot kill child process", but only with a clean working tree. Closing
the confirmation pops the context before running its handler, so the
files panel is re-focused and re-renders the main view, and only then
does the handler return ErrQuit. With no changed files that render is a
string task, whose whole body is one hop to the UI thread — a hop that
is never served, because the handler's ErrQuit has meanwhile brought the
main loop down. The task can't finish, so the ViewBufferManager.Close
that follows waits for it until it times out. (With changed files it's a
command task instead, and every blocking point in one of those selects
on the stop channel, so Close gets through.)
A wait for the UI thread now ends when the loop does. That also covers
the command task's own hops, which are stopped only in between them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nothing dequeues user events once MainLoop has returned, so a worker
blocked in OnUIThreadAndWait is blocked for good. The assertion records
that; the next commit makes the wait give up instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Right now the function always returns nil, but this will change later in
this branch, so handle errors properly. Without that, the first capture
that assigns env.git would not run, leave env.git nil, and subsequent
code would crash.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every caller passes an f that unconditionally returns nil, so f's error
return has never carried anything: the value is dead weight, and it
occupies the one channel the wait itself needs to report that it couldn't
run f at all. Drop it, so that the error the wait returns can only ever
mean that.
Work that can fail hands its error back through a captured variable, the
way the background fetch already hands back four values, which keeps the
two outcomes distinguishable at a call site that has both.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Git only writes the space after a marker when there is a label to write
after it, and the label can be empty: `git checkout -m` with the diff3
conflict style, for instance, has no name for the common ancestor, so it
writes a bare "|||||||" line.
Ask git for the attribute of every conflicted file whenever we load the
file status, so that we recognize the markers it actually wrote. Files
that are set up this way are precisely the ones whose regular content
tends to contain marker-looking lines, so matching a run of at least
seven characters instead is not an option: we'd take the file's own
content for markers and then never consider its conflicts resolved.
One `git check-attr` call covers all conflicted files at once; asking per
file would take seconds when hundreds of files are conflicted, and it
would hurt worst on Windows, where spawning a process is expensive.
Because the lookup rides along with the file status, it costs nothing
when there are no conflicts, and editing .gitattributes during a merge
takes effect on the next refresh.
When a file's conflict markers aren't seven characters long we don't
recognize them at all. Two things go wrong: we consider the file's
conflicts resolved, so we stage it and offer to continue the merge a
moment after stopping at it; and pressing enter on it shows its diff
instead of the merge conflicts view, leaving no way to resolve it in
lazygit.
Git doesn't always write conflict markers of seven characters: the
conflict-marker-size gitattribute overrides that per file, and it is set
for good reasons — for file types whose regular content tends to contain
marker-looking lines, such as documentation about merging, or test
scripts. We hard-code seven characters everywhere we look for markers,
so none of that works.
Prepare for honoring the attribute by threading the marker size through
everything that recognizes a marker, carried on the file model. Nothing
fills it in yet, so we still use git's default size of seven everywhere,
and matching is unchanged: a marker consists of exactly that many marker
characters, and all but the "=======" one are followed by a space and a
label.
Creating and applying a stash both touch every changed file, so in a
large repo they can take long enough to be noticeable — and running them
on the UI thread meant the confirmation popup stayed on screen, frozen,
for the whole operation. Run them on a worker instead, with a spinner,
and keep blocking input for their duration so that the type-ahead
guarantee the refresh used to provide still holds.
Dropping stays on the UI thread: it only rewrites the stash reflog, so
it's fast no matter how big the stashes are.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Collapsing the range before kicking off the refresh paints the new
selection against the list as it was before the drop, so for a frame the
entries that were just dropped are still on screen (and, with
gui.shrinkSidePanelsToContent, the panel is still at its old size).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pushing the files context right after kicking off the refresh moves the
focus (and, with gui.shrinkSidePanelsToContent, resizes the panels) a
frame before the refreshed stash and files lists arrive. Doing it from
Then puts it in the same frame as the data it belongs to.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Stashing and popping change both the stash list and the files list.
With each scope updating the UI as soon as its own refresh is done, the
two panels visibly change at different times; with
gui.shrinkSidePanelsToContent that also means their sizes change at
different times than their contents.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Running lazygit in a .git dir got you told you were in a bare repo,
which you weren't: the worktree was sitting right there, one directory
up. git's own convention is that a git dir called .git belongs to the
directory holding it — that's how `git worktree list` names the main
worktree — so ask that directory, and if it is a worktree, open the repo
we were really being asked about.
The git dirs that aren't called .git keep the answer they had. A linked
worktree's and a submodule's do have a worktree, but nothing we look at
says where, so we would be guessing; a bare repo's has none to find.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Entering a submodule clears GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE, as it must: they
say where the superproject is. But the stack we push the superproject
onto so that escape brings us back only held its path, and for a repo
opened with --git-dir/--work-tree the path leads nowhere — git can't
find a repo there. Escaping out of a submodule of a dotfile repo failed
with "not a git repository", or, if some unrelated repo happened to lie
above the work tree, quietly switched to that one instead.
Push the environment onto the stack along with the path, taken from the
repo paths rather than from the process env, so that it also covers a
repo we worked the location out for ourselves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
git finds a repo by looking for a .git in the directory a command runs
in. Lazygit runs its commands in the work tree, so that normally works —
but not when the git dir lives somewhere else entirely, which is what
core.worktree and --work-tree are for. Lazygit chdir'd into such a work
tree and then ran commands that couldn't see any repo from there, so
opening a repo with core.worktree set panicked on startup. It only
worked with --git-dir because that leaves GIT_DIR in the environment for
every command to inherit.
Work out at startup whether git can find the repo from its work tree,
and when it can't, put GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE on every command the
repo's builder produces. As with the working directory the builder pins
(527124d0e0), these also go into the process env — subprocesses don't
come through the builder — but the commands don't read them from there,
because the process env belongs to whichever repo we have switched to
since.
Working out whether git can find the repo means asking git, rather than
reading the .git file, whose contents can spell the same directory
differently than git does. The extra query is skipped for a repo whose
git dir is simply its .git directory, which is nearly all of them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE tell git where our repo is, and every command
we run inherits them — including the ones we point at a submodule or
another worktree. git resolves those against our repo instead, and says
nothing about it: with GIT_DIR set, `git -C mysub log -1` reports the
superproject's commit. So opening lazygit with --git-dir/--work-tree
quietly broke resolving submodule conflicts, stashing and resetting a
submodule, and detaching another worktree; the worktree list came back
claiming every worktree shared our git dir.
Drop the two variables from the commands that address another repo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reset told git to change directory with -C while runInParentModule does
it by setting the command's working directory, but they were computing
the same directory for the same reason. Use the helper, so that there is
one place that knows what running in a nested submodule's parent means.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Its working directory resolves against the process rather than against
the repo the command builder pins commands to, which is only safe
because nothing but foreground commands come through here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
git makes `rev-parse --show-toplevel` fatal when there's no work tree,
so asking for it together with everything else meant we never got an
answer at all for a bare repo: GetRepoPaths returned an error, nobody
ever saw IsBareRepo() == true, and lazygit either died with a stack
trace or decided we weren't in a repository. That's what you got for
opening it in a directory holding a bare repo and a .git file pointing
at it, which is a normal way to keep a repo and its worktrees together.
Ask again without --show-toplevel when the first query fails: the other
queries work fine without a work tree, so if they now succeed we know
we're in a bare repo, and the existing prompt offering to open a recent
repo does its job. If they fail too we're not in a repo at all, and the
first error already says so.
--is-bare-repository is gone from the query: a work tree implies
core.bare is false, so it could only ever come back false there, and
what matters to us is whether there is a work tree to show, which is
what we now go by.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
"does not yet support" reads as a promise that it will, but it's quite
likely that it never will.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
onNewRepo also runs when switching repos, and a failure there leaves us
in the repo we came from — with a nil GitCommand, which nothing else is
prepared for. Only assign once we have one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
RepoPath() is meant to be the same as WorktreePath() when we're in the
main worktree, but we derived it from the git dir's location instead.
That is only the same thing when the git dir lives inside the work tree.
With core.worktree, --work-tree, or a .git file pointing at a repo dir
that isn't called .git, it lands on a directory that isn't a worktree at
all, and the repo name we show follows it there.
A worktree that has the repo's common git dir to itself is the main
worktree, so use its path. That subsumes the submodule case, whose git
dir lives under the superproject's .git/modules but is still the
submodule's own common dir; --show-superproject-working-tree is now only
needed for a linked worktree of a submodule.
The existing bare repo test asserted a git output that can't occur (a
work tree and --is-bare-repository=true at once), but the rest of it is
the shape of a repo opened with --git-dir/--work-tree, where the new
repo path is the correct one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When the work tree lives somewhere else entirely — set up with
core.worktree or --work-tree — we're still in the main worktree, so
RepoPath() should be the work tree, as its own doc comment says. Instead
we derive it from the git dir's location, which lands somewhere that
isn't a worktree at all, and the repo name follows it.
The ACTUAL lines are indented as they will be once the EXPECTED ones
replace them, rather than as gofumpt wants them while the comment
markers are still splitting the struct's alignment. That leaves this one
file not gofumpt-clean until the next commit, in exchange for a diff
there that shows only the lines that actually change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`git worktree list` reports the main worktree as the common git dir with
a trailing "/.git" removed, which equals the working tree only when the
git dir sits inside it. In a submodule, a bare repo, or a repo using
core.worktree it doesn't, so comparing the reported path against the
working tree path matches nothing: no worktree is recognized as current
or as main. Most visibly, inside a submodule lazygit claimed we were in
a linked worktree named after the submodule, and offered to remove that
"worktree".
Comparing git dirs identifies a worktree unambiguously, so use that.
A worktree whose directory is gone has no git dir to compare, and there
we still have nothing better than its path.
The submodule tests were asserting the linked-worktree suffix in the
status view; it is gone now, and the repo name still says which
submodule we're in.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A submodule's git dir doesn't live inside its working tree, and `git
worktree list` reports it by its git dir. Lazygit compares that against
the working tree path, so it recognizes neither the current nor the main
worktree, and the UI ends up claiming we're in a linked worktree.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
