Parse is lenient: it takes any text and reads a diff out of it, which is
what we want when we hand it a diff, but it has no way to say "this
isn't one". We're about to parse the *rendered* contents of a diff view,
which a diff renderer is free to restructure — putting the line numbers
in a gutter, say, shifts the +/- marker off the start of each body line,
so every line reads as context and the parse silently lies about which
lines are changes.
Comparing each hunk's body against the lengths its header declares
catches exactly that, without teaching us anything about any particular
renderer's layout: a faithful unified diff agrees with its headers, a
restructured one doesn't.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Identifying a change line of a diff by its file line number needs both
sides: two consecutive deletions sit at the same new-file position, so
only their old-file line numbers tell them apart. LineNumberOfLine only
answers for the new file, which leaves deletions ambiguous.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lets pushing a range selection of tags push them all with a single
git command.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lets deleting a range selection of tags delete them all with a
single git command, the same way it works for branches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The worktree loader associates a worktree that is mid-rebase or
mid-bisect with the branch involved, even though its HEAD is detached.
Fast-forwarding such a branch therefore ran the fast-forward in that
worktree. This moved the detached HEAD and put the upstream commits
into the rebase in progress, while the branch stayed where it was.
Remember in the worktree model when its branch comes from a rebase or
bisect, and refuse to fast-forward the branch in that case. Updating
only the ref is no option for a rebase; the rebase writes the branch
when it finishes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Branches that lazygit forwards to their upstream move by a direct ref
write, so no git command turns up in their reflog to explain it. Until
now the entry had no message either, leaving `git reflog <branch>` with
nothing but a blank line about it. Name lazygit and what it did, so that
a branch which moved on its own can be traced.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After somebody else rebased and force-pushed a stack of branches, every
branch of the stack has to be brought back to its upstream, and pressing
`f` on them one by one is as tedious as the checking out and pulling it
replaces.
Let `f` work on a range selection. The upstream branches are fetched with
one `git fetch` per remote, and the branches that aren't checked out
anywhere move in a single `git update-ref` call. All the selected
branches are looked at before any of them is moved, so a branch that has
to be refused leaves the others alone rather than updating the stack
halfway.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When somebody else rebases a branch and force-pushes it, the local
branch is left diverged from it, so `f` refuses to touch it. To get back
in sync, the branch has to be checked out and pulled, and for a stack of
branches that means doing it once per branch.
Such a branch has none of its own work in it, though: the commits it is
ahead by are the old versions of the ones that are now on the remote
branch. So when the branch has diverged and none of the commits it is
ahead by is ours, reset it to its upstream instead of refusing. This is
the same state that checking the branch out and pulling it would produce,
as rebase drops commits that the upstream already has.
A branch that isn't checked out anywhere is reset with the same
`git update-ref` that a fast-forward uses. One that is checked out
somewhere is reset with `git reset --keep`, and only when that worktree
has no changes to tracked files, so that the files under the user's feet
change no more than they have to. `--keep` also refuses to overwrite an
untracked file that the reset would bring in, which `--hard` would do
silently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fast-forwarding a branch that isn't checked out ran a single
`git fetch <remote> refs/heads/<branch>:<branch>`, so git's own refusal
to move a local branch backwards served as the safety check. A later
commit widens the set of branches the command accepts, and for that
lazygit has to make that decision itself.
Fetch the remote branch on its own, updating only its remote-tracking
branch. Then ask git whether the branch is an ancestor of it, and only
then move the branch: with `git update-ref` when it isn't checked out
anywhere, guarded by the hash we knew it to have, and with
`git merge --ff-only` in its worktree when it is checked out there.
Keeping `git pull --ff-only` for the latter case would fetch a second
time.
Fast-forwarding a branch that isn't checked out in a worktree had no
integration test at all, so add one. The second new test covers a repo
that keeps no reflogs, because a later commit starts reading those and
this case has to keep working without them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The function asks git whether HEAD is an ancestor of a ref, and its name
says what the one caller wants to know. A later commit asks the same
question about a branch that isn't checked out, so let the caller name
both refs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When somebody else rebases a branch and force-pushes it, our branch
shows up as diverged, say ↓5↑3, and that looks exactly like a branch
that carries three commits of our own. The two want different treatment.
The first one only has to be moved to its upstream, while the second one
needs a decision about what to do with those commits. The panel doesn't
tell them apart, so users have to look at each branch in turn to find
out which one they are dealing with.
Determine for every diverged branch whether it has commits of its own,
and dim its divergence when it doesn't. This runs on a worker, as it
takes a few git commands per diverged branch, and a branch keeps the
answer from the previous load while a new one is in flight, so that the
display doesn't flicker. A later commit teaches the fast-forward command
to act on such a branch.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The flag says whether this load is the one that kicks off the values
determined in the background afterwards. A later commit adds a second of
those next to the behind-counts, so name the flag after what it controls
rather than after its only user so far.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A branch that has diverged from its upstream doesn't necessarily hold any
work of its own. If somebody else rewrote the remote branch and
force-pushed it, our branch is still at the commits it had before, and
every one of them was on the remote branch at some point. A later commit
offers to reset such a branch to its upstream, and for that it has to
tell this case apart from a branch that holds commits created here.
The reflog of the remote-tracking branch records the values it had before
it was rewritten, so a commit that was ever on the remote branch is
contained in its current value or in one of those. HasLocalOnlyCommits
asks git for a commit of the branch that none of them contains.
Two details of the reflog are worth knowing. The value the ref had before
its oldest entry is that entry's old value, and <ref>@{<number of
entries>} is the only way to name it. It doesn't exist when the oldest
entry is the one that created the ref, and asking for it then is an
error, not an empty result. Reflogs can also be missing altogether,
because core.logAllRefUpdates defaults to false in a bare repository.
Neither case must stop us from recognizing a branch that is strictly
behind its upstream, so the current value of the remote-tracking branch
is always used; missing previous values only make the answer more
conservative.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After rebasing a stack of branches, every branch of the stack has to be
force-pushed, and so far the only way to do that in lazygit was to check
out each branch in turn and push it. For a stack of a dozen branches
that is a lot of work for a routine task.
When the current branch is pushed and there are branches below it in the
stack that have commits to push, show a menu that offers to push them
along with it. The menu lists the branches and how far each of them has
diverged from its remote branch, so that the user can see what is about
to happen. It doesn't show where each branch goes; the branches panel
doesn't show that for a normal push either. Pushing only the current
branch is the second entry. If any of the branches has diverged from its
remote branch, a single confirmation covers force-pushing all of them.
A branch is offered if its tip is a commit of the current branch that
isn't merged yet, it has an upstream that is stored locally, that
upstream is not gone, and it is ahead of its push destination. Branches
without an upstream are left out because a branch that was never pushed
can't be told apart from one that is meant to stay local. A branch that
is only behind is left out because pushing it would move the remote
branch back to an older commit; the lease doesn't catch that when the
remote-tracking branch is up to date.
Each branch is pushed to where `git push` would push it if it were
checked out, using the destination git reports in the %(push) field.
This honors push.default, remote.pushDefault and
branch.<name>.pushRemote without lazygit having to interpret them.
Branches going to the same remote are pushed in one command, with
--force-with-lease when the user confirmed force-pushing; the lease
checks each ref against its remote-tracking branch, so a coworker's
unseen push is still rejected. The current branch joins that command
when its remote-tracking branch is stored locally. Otherwise it needs a
plain push first, for example with --set-upstream, and that option
would apply to every refspec of a combined command; so in that case it
is pushed on its own as before, and the other branches follow in a
second command.
Pushing the current branch on its own still runs a bare `git push`, so
users who rely on push.default or remote.<name>.push for it see no
change. The push is non-atomic, as git defaults to; if one branch's
lease fails, the others still go through and the error names the one to
look at.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PushOpts can only describe a push of the current branch. It takes the
branch's name and the upstream to push it to, and builds a single
refspec from them. Pushing several branches in one command needs one
refspec per branch, so let callers pass the refspecs themselves. The
sync controller, the only caller so far, builds the same single refspec
that PushCmdObj built before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
To push a branch other than the checked-out one, lazygit has to name the
remote and the remote branch in the push command; a bare `git push` only
works for the current branch. The upstream isn't always the right
destination. In a triangular workflow the branch is pushed to a
different remote than it pulls from, and with push.default set to
"current" it goes to a branch of the same name whatever the upstream is
called.
Read the destination from git instead of working it out from the config.
The %(push) field of for-each-ref names the remote-tracking ref that a
push would update, taking push.default, remote.pushDefault and
branch.<name>.pushRemote into account. It is also the ref that the
push:track counts are computed against, so the force-push detection and
the destination agree. The field is available since git 2.5, well before
the oldest version lazygit supports.
Nothing uses the new fields yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
On the Windows CI job,
TestStartPipelineReadsWhatTheCommandsComplainAbout fails now and then
because the output it reads has an extra line after the expected one.
The line starts with "error: coverage meta-data emit failed" and ends
with "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by
another process."
The pipeline tests run the test binary itself as the members of the
pipeline. CI builds it with -cover, and the members inherit GOCOVERDIR
from go test, so each of them writes coverage data to that directory
when it calls os.Exit. The meta-data file has the same name for every
process of one binary, and every process replaces it by renaming a new
copy onto it. (Go's check for an existing file compares its size against
the wrong length, so it never finds one.) On Windows this rename fails
if another process holds the file open. In this test both members exit
at the same time, and the runtime prints the failure to stderr.
StartPipeline puts every member's stderr into the output that the test
compares.
Exit the members with syscall.Exit instead. It skips the runtime's exit
hooks, so the members write no coverage data at all. Nothing is lost by
this. Their coverage data went to a temporary directory of go test, not
to the directory that CI uploads.
The test was added in dfd6a7dbf2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Renders were kept from refreshing git's index because a pty-rendered
command on Windows is terminated at an arbitrary instruction when its
task stops, and one landing in the window where git holds index.lock to
write back refreshed stat information leaves that lock behind.
A render no longer runs in a pty there, and nothing kills it any more
either: the pipe to the renderer breaks, git's write fails, and git dies
through its own die path with its lock files cleaned up. So let the
refresh happen, and let renders heal stale stat info the way they do
everywhere else.
The teardown of a pseudoconsole took its reassurance about index.lock
from this, and renders were the reason it held. What still runs in a pty
there is a custom command asking for logWithPty and a command that may
be asked for a credential, so the claim no longer follows; drop it
rather than restate it for clients it was never about.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
ConPTY doesn't carry a diff renderer's output to us as the renderer
wrote it. It parses the output into a screen buffer and re-encodes that
for the terminal side, and a sequence it can't represent there goes out
the moment it is parsed, separately from the text around it. The OSC
1717 records a renderer states its diff lines in therefore arrive
detached from the rows they describe, and the identity layer attributes
rows to the wrong diff line or to none.
Feed the renderer through a pipe there instead, so that its bytes reach
us unaltered. A stdin filter becomes a command of our own, since git
only invokes the one named by GIT_PAGER when it talks to a terminal; an
external diff renderer is git's own business either way and needs
nothing but the pipe.
Unix keeps the pty. A renderer reads the width to lay out to off it, so
taking it away would leave every configuration that doesn't name a
width rendering at whatever the renderer falls back to, and diff
renderers have worked on Unix far too long for that.
LAZYGIT_RENDER_WITHOUT_PTY asks for the piped path anyway, which is how
the integration tests cover it on a platform where they run at all.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
An external diff command rides on the git command as a diff.external
config, which means it is fixed when the command is built. That is
before the layout pass, so the width the renderer is to lay out for
isn't known yet, and the command can't be told about it.
Pass it as GIT_EXTERNAL_DIFF from the render instead, where the width
is known and where a stdin filter is already handed to git the same
way. git ranks the variable exactly as it ranks the config, behind a
per-path diff driver from .gitattributes, so a repository that defines
one still gets it (verified on git 2.22.5 and 2.55). An empty command
means the user wants their own git config to apply, so leave the
variable unset for that; git takes it being set at all as an
instruction.
The renderer command leaves the git arguments, so it also leaves the key
that says which diff a render is of. Cycling between two external diff
renderers now keeps the view's place, the way cycling between two stdin
filters already does.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rendering a diff through a renderer on Windows means running the
renderer ourselves, since ConPTY mangles the metadata records it emits
and git only invokes a renderer of its own when it talks to a terminal.
That needs a chain of commands whose output a view can be filled from
while it runs, where PipeCommands runs a chain to completion and reports
what it said afterwards.
StartPipeline starts such a chain and hands back the reader for its
output, along with a handle offering exactly what a render task asks of
a command: something to wait for, something to name it by, and a way to
stop it. Every command's stderr joins the output, so a renderer that
objects to its input says so where the diff would have been.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
If a command in a pipeline exits before reading all of its input, the
command feeding it keeps running and PipeCommands never returns.
The parent holds on to the read end of every pipe it wires between two
commands. A pipe with a reader is a pipe worth writing to, so the
command writing into it is never told that nobody is listening.
Close the parent's ends once the commands are running, since each of
them holds its own by then. The write ends have to go as well, or the
command reading a link never reaches the end of its input.
No caller reaches this today. The one chain lazygit pipes is
`git stash show -p` into `git apply -R`, and apply reads its whole input
before it does anything with it, so it never leaves the show writing to
nobody. The chain about to be added for diff renderers is a different
matter: a renderer can fail at any point of its input, and a render that
is no longer wanted is stopped part way through by design.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
PipeCommands runs a chain of commands to completion and gathers what
they wrote to stderr. Rendering a diff through a renderer needs the same
chain, but has to read the last command's output as it arrives, so it
can't use PipeCommands as it stands.
Pull out what both need: naming the chain for a log, wiring each
command's output to the next one's input, and starting them all with the
cleanup a failure to start requires.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When lazygit starts up in a repo with many remote branches, the pull request
icons in the branches panel show up a good while after the branch list itself,
even though the pull requests come from the cache file and are in the model
before the first render. In the repo where this showed up (5400 remote
branches) the icons were up to half a second late.
The icons are rendered from Model.PullRequestsMap, and that map is built from
the remotes' URLs, because a branch's upstream remote tells us which repo
owner's pull requests to look for. The map therefore stays empty until the
remotes are in the model, and the remotes refresh doesn't put them there until
it has also enumerated and sorted all remote branches. In a big repo that takes
hundreds of milliseconds; reading the remotes themselves takes ten.
Load the two separately, and put the remotes in the model as soon as they have
been read from the git config. The branches refresh then finds them there, and
the pull request icons are part of the first render of the branch list.
Carry over the branches of the remotes we already have in the model in that
first update, so that the remote branches, and the branch counts in the remotes
panel, stay in place until the fresh ones are loaded.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Force-pushing a stack of branches puts the same commits on the remote,
so the remote branches panel shows the same alphabetical order for a
stack that the local branches panel did. Sort them by ancestry too,
which needs the tip hash and committer date of each remote branch.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sorting the branches of a remote by ancestry works on the whole list, so
build the list first and group it by remote once it is in the right
order.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
It needs the git version to decide whether the ahead-behind format is
available, and GitCommon already carries the common state and the command
builder that the loader used to take separately.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
In date order, the branches panel lists a stack of branches
alphabetically rather than from the top of the stack down. Rebasing a
stack creates all of its commits within the same second, so all of its
branch tips end up carrying the same committer date, and git sorts refs
with equal committer dates by name.
Sort each group of branches that share a committer date by ancestry
instead, so that a branch comes before the branches it is based on.
Branches that are not descended from one another keep the alphabetical
order git gave them. Determining the ancestry takes one more
for-each-ref call, and it only runs when there is a group to sort.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
parseAheadBehindForEachRefOutput dropped fields it couldn't parse, which
left the remaining ones of that line pointing at the wrong bases. The
caller that picks the closest base doesn't care, but sorting refs by
ancestry has to know which base a pair of numbers belongs to. Return an
entry per base and mark the ones that were malformed, as the function's
comment has claimed all along.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The function always asked about every ref under refs/heads. Sorting refs
by ancestry needs the ahead-behind values of a handful of named refs, and
for remote branches those live under refs/remotes, so take the patterns
as an argument. The bases can be commit hashes as well as ref names.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Building and parsing `git for-each-ref --format=%(ahead-behind:<base>)`
is not specific to loading local branches; the commits below use it to
sort refs by ancestry, from the remote branch loader too. Give these
helpers and their tests a file of their own.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The recent repos helper is about to run a git command against each repo
in the menu, and it needs the same treatment of GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE
that everything else pointed at another repo gets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Narrow rebase refreshes already have complete metadata for existing
todos. Reuse it so repeated todo moves do not spawn git show for the
entire list. New hashes still fall back to hydration.
The files and commit files panels each had their own copy of this, one of
which used to be missing the previous path of a rename. Growing them
apart again is the last thing we want, since the next commit needs to
teach both of them about renames that cross a directory boundary.
The files panel version only returned paths for the filtered case, and
left it to WorktreeFileDiffCmdObj to derive the rest from the node; now
that all callers pass the paths in, that command doesn't need to know
about renames at all.
It existed for the incremental re-render: a shorter render left the previous
one's view lines in the tail (deliberately, to avoid a blank frame), and this
cleared them once the new content was fully read. Async renders now build
off-screen and swap in whole, so refreshViewLinesIfNeeded truncates the view
lines to the buffer and no tail can form. All the call at end-of-input still
did was discard every wrapped line and force the whole buffer to be re-wrapped
on the next draw, which is pure work on a large diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Finding out which of the files are worktrees of ours had its own answer
to where this repo's worktrees are, walking the directory that git keeps
them in. The worktrees panel asks git itself, and that is the better
answer: it is the one git gives for the same question elsewhere in the
app, and it doesn't need to know where git records what.
The model that panel fills is all the files need, so mark them from it.
That takes the work out of the file loader, whose other two callers were
paying for it without wanting it, and it costs no git call at all: both
models are written on the UI thread, so whichever of the two refreshes
lands second marks the files against the other's fresh data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
go-gh reads gh's config file once per process and answers from that
snapshot for the rest of the process's life. gh rewrites the file
whenever the active account changes, and stores the active account's
token either in it or in the system keyring, depending on the account.
A lazygit that has been running for a while therefore consults a
snapshot that no longer describes reality: it either keeps using a
token for an account that is no longer active, or, when the snapshot
was taken while a keyring-backed account was active, finds no token at
all and silently stops showing pull requests until it is restarted.
Asking gh resolves the token afresh on every refresh, from whichever of
the environment, the keyring or the config file currently holds it.
go-gh's lookup stays behind as a fallback for setups without the gh
binary, where it still picks up GH_TOKEN and friends.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ask git for the attribute of every conflicted file whenever we load the
file status, so that we recognize the markers it actually wrote. Files
that are set up this way are precisely the ones whose regular content
tends to contain marker-looking lines, so matching a run of at least
seven characters instead is not an option: we'd take the file's own
content for markers and then never consider its conflicts resolved.
One `git check-attr` call covers all conflicted files at once; asking per
file would take seconds when hundreds of files are conflicted, and it
would hurt worst on Windows, where spawning a process is expensive.
Because the lookup rides along with the file status, it costs nothing
when there are no conflicts, and editing .gitattributes during a merge
takes effect on the next refresh.
Git doesn't always write conflict markers of seven characters: the
conflict-marker-size gitattribute overrides that per file, and it is set
for good reasons — for file types whose regular content tends to contain
marker-looking lines, such as documentation about merging, or test
scripts. We hard-code seven characters everywhere we look for markers,
so none of that works.
Prepare for honoring the attribute by threading the marker size through
everything that recognizes a marker, carried on the file model. Nothing
fills it in yet, so we still use git's default size of seven everywhere,
and matching is unchanged: a marker consists of exactly that many marker
characters, and all but the "=======" one are followed by a space and a
label.
Running lazygit in a .git dir got you told you were in a bare repo,
which you weren't: the worktree was sitting right there, one directory
up. git's own convention is that a git dir called .git belongs to the
directory holding it — that's how `git worktree list` names the main
worktree — so ask that directory, and if it is a worktree, open the repo
we were really being asked about.
The git dirs that aren't called .git keep the answer they had. A linked
worktree's and a submodule's do have a worktree, but nothing we look at
says where, so we would be guessing; a bare repo's has none to find.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
git finds a repo by looking for a .git in the directory a command runs
in. Lazygit runs its commands in the work tree, so that normally works —
but not when the git dir lives somewhere else entirely, which is what
core.worktree and --work-tree are for. Lazygit chdir'd into such a work
tree and then ran commands that couldn't see any repo from there, so
opening a repo with core.worktree set panicked on startup. It only
worked with --git-dir because that leaves GIT_DIR in the environment for
every command to inherit.
Work out at startup whether git can find the repo from its work tree,
and when it can't, put GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE on every command the
repo's builder produces. As with the working directory the builder pins
(527124d0e0), these also go into the process env — subprocesses don't
come through the builder — but the commands don't read them from there,
because the process env belongs to whichever repo we have switched to
since.
Working out whether git can find the repo means asking git, rather than
reading the .git file, whose contents can spell the same directory
differently than git does. The extra query is skipped for a repo whose
git dir is simply its .git directory, which is nearly all of them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE tell git where our repo is, and every command
we run inherits them — including the ones we point at a submodule or
another worktree. git resolves those against our repo instead, and says
nothing about it: with GIT_DIR set, `git -C mysub log -1` reports the
superproject's commit. So opening lazygit with --git-dir/--work-tree
quietly broke resolving submodule conflicts, stashing and resetting a
submodule, and detaching another worktree; the worktree list came back
claiming every worktree shared our git dir.
Drop the two variables from the commands that address another repo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reset told git to change directory with -C while runInParentModule does
it by setting the command's working directory, but they were computing
the same directory for the same reason. Use the helper, so that there is
one place that knows what running in a nested submodule's parent means.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Its working directory resolves against the process rather than against
the repo the command builder pins commands to, which is only safe
because nothing but foreground commands come through here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
git makes `rev-parse --show-toplevel` fatal when there's no work tree,
so asking for it together with everything else meant we never got an
answer at all for a bare repo: GetRepoPaths returned an error, nobody
ever saw IsBareRepo() == true, and lazygit either died with a stack
trace or decided we weren't in a repository. That's what you got for
opening it in a directory holding a bare repo and a .git file pointing
at it, which is a normal way to keep a repo and its worktrees together.
Ask again without --show-toplevel when the first query fails: the other
queries work fine without a work tree, so if they now succeed we know
we're in a bare repo, and the existing prompt offering to open a recent
repo does its job. If they fail too we're not in a repo at all, and the
first error already says so.
--is-bare-repository is gone from the query: a work tree implies
core.bare is false, so it could only ever come back false there, and
what matters to us is whether there is a work tree to show, which is
what we now go by.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
RepoPath() is meant to be the same as WorktreePath() when we're in the
main worktree, but we derived it from the git dir's location instead.
That is only the same thing when the git dir lives inside the work tree.
With core.worktree, --work-tree, or a .git file pointing at a repo dir
that isn't called .git, it lands on a directory that isn't a worktree at
all, and the repo name we show follows it there.
A worktree that has the repo's common git dir to itself is the main
worktree, so use its path. That subsumes the submodule case, whose git
dir lives under the superproject's .git/modules but is still the
submodule's own common dir; --show-superproject-working-tree is now only
needed for a linked worktree of a submodule.
The existing bare repo test asserted a git output that can't occur (a
work tree and --is-bare-repository=true at once), but the rest of it is
the shape of a repo opened with --git-dir/--work-tree, where the new
repo path is the correct one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When the work tree lives somewhere else entirely — set up with
core.worktree or --work-tree — we're still in the main worktree, so
RepoPath() should be the work tree, as its own doc comment says. Instead
we derive it from the git dir's location, which lands somewhere that
isn't a worktree at all, and the repo name follows it.
The ACTUAL lines are indented as they will be once the EXPECTED ones
replace them, rather than as gofumpt wants them while the comment
markers are still splitting the struct's alignment. That leaves this one
file not gofumpt-clean until the next commit, in exchange for a diff
there that shows only the lines that actually change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`git worktree list` reports the main worktree as the common git dir with
a trailing "/.git" removed, which equals the working tree only when the
git dir sits inside it. In a submodule, a bare repo, or a repo using
core.worktree it doesn't, so comparing the reported path against the
working tree path matches nothing: no worktree is recognized as current
or as main. Most visibly, inside a submodule lazygit claimed we were in
a linked worktree named after the submodule, and offered to remove that
"worktree".
Comparing git dirs identifies a worktree unambiguously, so use that.
A worktree whose directory is gone has no git dir to compare, and there
we still have nothing better than its path.
The submodule tests were asserting the linked-worktree suffix in the
status view; it is gone now, and the repo name still says which
submodule we're in.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A submodule's git dir doesn't live inside its working tree, and `git
worktree list` reports it by its git dir. Lazygit compares that against
the working tree path, so it recognizes neither the current nor the main
worktree, and the UI ends up claiming we're in a linked worktree.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
