Staging in the main view leaves you looking at the working tree's diff with
everything you meant to stage in the index — and, until now, having to go
back to the files panel to commit it. The commit keys, and the one that
finds the commit a fixup belongs to, are offered there too, so that the
whole staging-to-committing round happens in one place.
They act on the working tree, which the main view only sometimes shows, so
they do nothing over a commit's or a stash's diff — browsing history can't
commit by accident — and are listed only where they do something. The check
happens per press: what the main view is showing changes as the user moves
about, while the bindings are registered once.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The remove key now works on a diff selection the way it does in the staging
view: on the unstaged side it throws the selected lines away, which it asks
about first, and on the staged side it takes them out of the index, which is
unstaging and needs no warning.
It goes through the same path as staging, so that everything around the
action behaves identically — the selection lands on the change that took the
place of the discarded one, and the focus follows the side it acted on.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Space in the focused main view now acts on the selected lines the way it
does in the staging view: over the working tree's unstaged changes it puts
them into the index, and over the staged ones it takes them back out. Which
of the two it does is a property of the pane, each side of the diff having
one of its own. Nothing has to be entered first, and a selection reaching
across several files of a directory's diff is applied as one patch per file.
The rows on screen are only a picture of the diff, so the patch is built
from the diff itself: each selected row's identity — which file, which line
of it, and whether it is a deletion — is looked for in the file's own diff,
and the lines that match are the ones the patch includes. Matching by
position rather than by counting rows is what tells the two halves of a
modified line apart, since the deletion and the addition replacing it sit at
the same place in the new file.
Panels other than the working tree offer no action on their diff yet, so
space says nothing and does nothing there.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The main view shows a diff renderer's picture of a diff, and that is not
what you want on your clipboard: a renderer may drop the +/- column, move
the line numbers into a gutter, group a hunk's deletions before its
additions, or leave lines out altogether. So copying takes the lines from
the diff itself, locating them by the identity of the selected rows.
Only the panel that produced the diff can produce it again, though: the
working tree's staged or unstaged side, a commit's, a stash entry's. The
new seam is there for that. It asks per file, so that copying three lines
of a commit's diff doesn't fetch the whole of it, and it will grow the
actions on a selection as staging and patch building arrive.
The clipboard gets the run of diff lines from the first selected line of
a file to the last, so that lines the renderer hid come along and the
result still reads as a diff. Headers count as selected lines too. A hunk
header names the first line of its hunk, so it is looked for the way a
line of the file is. A file header names no line at all, and a rendering
may draw it over any number of rows, so a selection touching one of them
takes the whole header.
As in the patch explorers, a selection that is all additions or all
deletions loses its +/- column, ready to be pasted into code. One that
reaches into a header keeps the columns, and what comes out is a patch
fragment rather than lines of code.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reading a diff is often how you notice something to fix, and the file and
line are right there in front of you — so pressing edit opens the file at
the line under the selection, as it does in the staging view.
The line number the diff shows is the line number in the version the diff
is of, which for a commit's diff is not where that line sits today, so it
is carried forward the same way clicking a diff-renderer hyperlink already
does. A file header names no line, so it just opens the file.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reading a diff of any size means moving in bigger steps than a line at a
time, which the staging view offers and the main view didn't. So the same
hunk keys work here, and n / N step from file to file — worth having only
here, since a diff spanning several files is something the staging view
never showed.
Where "the next file" begins isn't in the text: a diff renderer may print
whatever it likes above a file's content. So navigation lands on the first
row that states which file it belongs to, which is the file's header when
the source says so and its first content line otherwise. The anchor's own
file is found by scanning down rather than to the nearest row either way —
having just landed on a header, the nearest row above belongs to the file
we came from, and taking it would send the next press back where we
started.
A file you go to is brought to the top of the view, since the file is what
you went there for and the more of it is on screen the better. That only
applies where the view has to scroll at all: a file already on screen
leaves it where it is. In hunk mode what ends up selected is the file's
first change rather than the row the file begins at, and a large context
size can put that change further down than a screenful; the selection is
scrolled into view afterwards as any other jump's is, and the alignment
gives way where the two can't both hold.
The diff loads lazily, so a target below the loaded portion isn't there to
be found; rather than doing nothing, we read the rest in and look again.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The focused main view could be scrolled but not pointed at: there was no
way to say "this line" or "these lines", which is what every line-level
interaction needs — editing a line, copying part of a diff, and, later,
staging. So a diff main view now always carries a selection while focused,
starting at the first change already on screen so that focusing doesn't
move the view.
The mode of the selection lives on the main context (a single line, a
range from a fixed anchor, or the change block around the cursor); the
selected line and the range anchor stay in the view itself, whose native
range select draws them, so there is no new highlight machinery. The modes
and their keys are the ones the staging view has, including that the arrow
keys step from block to block in hunk mode.
A pane holds something to select only when what it is showing is a diff
with changes in it, which the render works out once its content is final: a
placeholder message is not a diff, and neither is a diff with nothing in it
at all, such as a binary file's or an empty commit's. Whether a selection
is then drawn there follows from the context stack, as it does for every
other view.
A click in the focused main view now has a meaning again: it selects the
line it points at.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was an attempt to make lazygit's overall UI look more "elegant",
but it has too many problems. The biggest is that we have panels that
combine two views (e.g. a prompt with suggestions below, or the commit
message editor with subject and body), and showing the frame of the
inactive half of these as "dim" looks wrong; we'd have to add a new
concept of a view that doesn't have the focus but otherwise still looks
active.
Also, some terminals don't do a good job of showing lines made of dim
box drawing characters (e.g. Zed's builtin terminal). This could
probably be improved by using a grey hex color instead of dim, but then
we'd have to pick one that looks good with all possible terminal color
scheme.
That's too many questions, and it's not important enough to spend time
on this, so just revert the change.
When somebody else rebases a stack and force-pushes it, pulling the
topmost branch leaves the branches below it diverged. They can be
updated with `f`, but pushing the stack offers to push the branches
below along with the current one, and pulling should be symmetric.
When pulling, find the branches stacked below the current one that can
be updated without losing anything. These are those that are behind
their upstream branches, and those that diverged from them only because
they were rewritten. If there are any, show a menu that lists them and
offers to update them in addition to pulling the current branch, or to
pull only the current branch. The current branch is pulled as before.
The decision is based on the last fetch, not on a new one, so that the
menu appears right away. If the remote has changed since then, a branch
might not be offered although it could be updated; it then shows as
diverged after the pull, and pulling again offers it. The update itself
fetches the upstream branches and checks them again, so it never loses
commits.
Branches that are checked out in another worktree are not offered,
since updating them would change the files there.
The branches below are updated before the current branch is pulled. If
one of them pointed into the commits that a rebasing pull rebases, the
pull would move it when rebase.updateRefs is set, and updating it
afterwards would fail. If updating them fails, the current branch isn't
pulled.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
If a main branch is checked out in another worktree, auto-forwarding
after a fetch skips it. People who keep the main branch checked out in
their main worktree, and work on feature branches in linked worktrees,
therefore never get it forwarded.
Fast-forward such a branch in the worktree it is checked out in, as `f`
does. Skip the worktree if it has changes to tracked files, since
nobody asked for its files to change. Also skip it if it is mid-rebase
or mid-bisect, because its HEAD is then detached from the branch. A
branch in the current worktree is never forwarded. This covers the case
of the current worktree being mid-rebase on a main branch, whose ref
would otherwise be forwarded under the rebase.
Auto-forwarding now writes the same reflog message as `f`
("lazygit: update to upstream branch").
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After somebody else rebased and force-pushed a stack of branches, every
branch of the stack has to be brought back to its upstream, and pressing
`f` on them one by one is as tedious as the checking out and pulling it
replaces.
Let `f` work on a range selection. The upstream branches are fetched with
one `git fetch` per remote, and the branches that aren't checked out
anywhere move in a single `git update-ref` call. All the selected
branches are looked at before any of them is moved, so a branch that has
to be refused leaves the others alone rather than updating the stack
halfway.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When somebody else rebases a branch and force-pushes it, the local
branch is left diverged from it, so `f` refuses to touch it. To get back
in sync, the branch has to be checked out and pulled, and for a stack of
branches that means doing it once per branch.
Such a branch has none of its own work in it, though: the commits it is
ahead by are the old versions of the ones that are now on the remote
branch. So when the branch has diverged and none of the commits it is
ahead by is ours, reset it to its upstream instead of refusing. This is
the same state that checking the branch out and pulling it would produce,
as rebase drops commits that the upstream already has.
A branch that isn't checked out anywhere is reset with the same
`git update-ref` that a fast-forward uses. One that is checked out
somewhere is reset with `git reset --keep`, and only when that worktree
has no changes to tracked files, so that the files under the user's feet
change no more than they have to. `--keep` also refuses to overwrite an
untracked file that the reset would bring in, which `--hard` would do
silently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After rebasing a stack of branches, every branch of the stack has to be
force-pushed, and so far the only way to do that in lazygit was to check
out each branch in turn and push it. For a stack of a dozen branches
that is a lot of work for a routine task.
When the current branch is pushed and there are branches below it in the
stack that have commits to push, show a menu that offers to push them
along with it. The menu lists the branches and how far each of them has
diverged from its remote branch, so that the user can see what is about
to happen. It doesn't show where each branch goes; the branches panel
doesn't show that for a normal push either. Pushing only the current
branch is the second entry. If any of the branches has diverged from its
remote branch, a single confirmation covers force-pushing all of them.
A branch is offered if its tip is a commit of the current branch that
isn't merged yet, it has an upstream that is stored locally, that
upstream is not gone, and it is ahead of its push destination. Branches
without an upstream are left out because a branch that was never pushed
can't be told apart from one that is meant to stay local. A branch that
is only behind is left out because pushing it would move the remote
branch back to an older commit; the lease doesn't catch that when the
remote-tracking branch is up to date.
Each branch is pushed to where `git push` would push it if it were
checked out, using the destination git reports in the %(push) field.
This honors push.default, remote.pushDefault and
branch.<name>.pushRemote without lazygit having to interpret them.
Branches going to the same remote are pushed in one command, with
--force-with-lease when the user confirmed force-pushing; the lease
checks each ref against its remote-tracking branch, so a coworker's
unseen push is still rejected. The current branch joins that command
when its remote-tracking branch is stored locally. Otherwise it needs a
plain push first, for example with --set-upstream, and that option
would apply to every refspec of a combined command; so in that case it
is pushed on its own as before, and the other branches follow in a
second command.
Pushing the current branch on its own still runs a bare `git push`, so
users who rely on push.default or remote.<name>.push for it see no
change. The push is non-atomic, as git defaults to; if one branch's
lease fails, the others still go through and the error names the one to
look at.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The text of the selected line is always bold. Some users don't like
this (#2304), but there is no way to turn it off. Setting
selectedLineBgColor doesn't help. Its attributes apply to the text too,
so it can add bold, but it can't take it away.
Add gui.theme.selectedLineFgColor for the text of the selected line, in
focused and unfocused views alike. Its attributes are added to those of
the text, and a color replaces the colors of the text. It is [bold] by
default, so nothing changes unless you set it; 'default' leaves the
text as it is.
Putting bold into the default of selectedLineBgColor instead wouldn't
work well. To turn it off, you would have to replace the whole list, and
lose the color that is computed from the terminal's background.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
On a light background, the selected line is black text on the palette's
blue. With most palettes, this is hard to read. Light palettes make all
their colors dark enough to read as text on the light background, so
none of them works well as a background for text.
On a light background, mix 25% of #0064ff into the terminal's background
instead. On white, this gives #bfd8ff. The colored text on the selected
line then stays as readable as it is elsewhere.
On a dark background, keep the palette's blue. Dark palettes make it
dark enough to work as a background, and it keeps working on terminals
with only 8 colors. There, a color mixed from a dark background would
turn into black.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The borders of inactive windows are drawn in the terminal's default text
color, so they are as prominent as the text inside the windows. Draw
them in faint text instead. The terminal shades faint text toward its
background, so this works on dark and light backgrounds alike, and also
on backgrounds that are neither black nor white. The titles of inactive
windows use the same color, so they are dimmed too.
Terminals that don't support faint text draw the borders in the default
color, as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Some theme colors can't have one default that suits both dark and light
backgrounds. A gray background for the selected line of an inactive
view has to be lighter than the terminal's background if that is dark,
and darker if it is light.
Give such fields a default for each kind of background. Derive it from
the terminal's background color if the terminal tells us, so that it
keeps the same distance from the background however dark or light that
is, and takes on its tint. Otherwise, assume a black or white
background.
These defaults can't be the defaults of gui.theme. We would then have
to tell whether a value there came from the user or from the built-in
defaults, because only the user's value should win over a background
default. Keep them apart from the user config instead, and leave these
fields empty in the defaults of gui.theme, so that a value there always
comes from the user. Tests ensure that no field has both kinds of
defaults, and that both kinds of background set the same fields.
Start with inactiveViewSelectedLineBgColor: the background mixed with
30% white if it is dark (#4d4d4d on black), or with 15% black if it is
light (#d9d9d9 on white). A gray background shows where the selection
is in a view without the focus more clearly than the bold text we used
so far.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The faint attribute makes text recede on dark and light backgrounds
alike, without having to pick a gray for each. Let users use it in the
theme.
Some theme colors go through both GetTextStyle and GetGocuiStyle, so
both have to know it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A color that reads well on a dark background can be hard to read on a
light one, and the other way round. If you switch your terminal between
dark and light, there is often no single set of theme colors that works
for both (#4366).
Add two overrides of gui.theme, one for each kind of background.
gui.colorScheme, or else what the terminal tells us, decides which one
applies. A field that is set in the override replaces the one in
gui.theme. Author colors and branch color patterns are merged by entry
instead, so that an override doesn't have to repeat the entries it
doesn't change.
When the terminal's background changes, re-apply the theme and
re-render all views, not only the ones that show author colors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
We are about to add overrides of gui.theme for dark and light
backgrounds. Author and branch colors need them too, because a color
that reads well on a dark background may be hard to read on a light
one. Move them into gui.theme, so that the overrides cover them without
a mechanism of their own.
The migration of gui.branchColors creates gui.branchColorPatterns, so it
now has to run before the moves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
If several patterns in gui.branchColorPatterns match a branch, the color
it gets is picked at random, and it can change from one render to the
next. The patterns are kept in a Go map, and Go randomizes the order in
which a map is iterated.
Keep the patterns in a list instead, in the order in which they are
written, and let the first match win. If a repo's config file has
patterns too, put them in front of those of the global config file,
because they are more specific.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Renderers like delta and difftastic pick their colors for either a dark
or a light background, and they can't find out which one the terminal
has. Lazygit runs them with TERM=dumb, in a pty that doesn't answer
their queries. So the colors come from the config, and when the
terminal switches between dark and light, the diff keeps the ones it
has.
Add {{colorScheme}} to the commands of diff renderers. It is 'dark' or
'light', going by gui.colorScheme, or by the terminal if that is
'auto'. It can be passed to delta as --{{colorScheme}} and to
difftastic as --background={{colorScheme}}; other renderers can choose
between options with a template expression. When the terminal switches
between dark and light, render the diff again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The command of a diff renderer can refer to values like the width it
renders at, as {{width}}. They are filled in by plain replacement, so a
command can't choose between options depending on them. The next commit
adds a value that needs this: whether the terminal is dark or light.
delta takes --dark or --light, but for other renderers the choice has to
be spelled out differently, for example as the name of a syntax theme.
Resolve the command as a Go template instead. The values become its
variables, so that {{if gt .width 160}} --side-by-side{{end}} works too.
To keep the existing commands working, a variable can still be written
without the leading dot.
A mistake in a template, such as a misspelled variable, now makes
resolving the command fail, instead of leaving the placeholder in it.
Check the commands when the config is loaded, by resolving each of them
with made-up values, so that the mistake shows up as an invalid config.
This also rejects a variable that the kind of renderer doesn't have,
such as {{columnWidth}} in the command of an external diff; until now,
it reached the renderer as it was.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The colors that lazygit derives from the names of authors are picked
for a dark background. On a light one, they are too pale to read;
against white, every author has a contrast ratio between 2.2:1 and
3.5:1.
Now that lazygit knows whether the terminal is dark or light, pick them
from a darker range of lightness when it is light. Against white, the
contrast ratio is now between 5.2:1 and 9.2:1, and against the
background of Solarized Light between 4.8:1 and 8.5:1. On a dark
background, nothing changes. If the terminal switches between dark and
light while lazygit is running, draw the commits again in the new
colors.
Add gui.colorScheme for terminals that don't tell us, and for anyone
who wants to override what they tell. It is 'auto' by default; 'dark'
and 'light' ignore what the terminal says.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
For a long time lazygit has used the term "custom pager" to refer to
what's really a "diff renderer". A pager is a program that allows you to
view output page by page (hence the name), e.g. less; lazygit's custom
diff renderers are not pagers. It used the term only because the feature
is implemented using git's GIT_PAGER env var, but that's an
implementation detail.
Rename the 'git.pagers' config to 'git.diffRenderers', and restructure
its elements while we're at it to make things clearer:
- Add a 'type' field to explicitly specify which type of diff renderer
it is (the two fundamentally different ones are 'stdinFilter' and
'extDiff').
- Add a third type, 'rawGit', which has an 'args' field that makes it
easy to use 'git --color-words' as a custom renderer
- Unify the old 'pager' and 'externalDiffCommand' fields to a single
'command' field for both types
Existing config files are migrated automatically.
Accordion mode expands the focused side panel, but when that panel has
little content (an empty Files panel, a Branches panel with only master)
it just fills the extra height with blank space. The same waste happens
for any panel that gets more height than it has content to show.
When this option is enabled, each side panel is sized to its own content
(plus a blank line, so it's clear there's nothing more below) rather than
to an equal share of the height. The height a small panel gives up flows
to the panels that have more content than fits; those grow up to their
content and then scroll, weighted toward the focused panel in accordion
mode so the two features compose. Only when every panel fits with room to
spare is the leftover shared out equally, regardless of focus: enlarging
the focused panel there would reveal no more content and would only make
the panels jump around as the focus moves.
The option is independent of expandFocusedSidePanel and off by default.
The status panel, and the stash panel when unfocused, keep their fixed
one-line height as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A handful of default keybindings differ by platform (e.g. word-wise
cursor movement in text inputs uses alt on macOS but ctrl elsewhere).
Lazygit chooses these based on the OS it runs on, but that's the wrong
signal when the OS isn't where the user is actually typing: someone
running lazygit in a Linux container that they access over ssh from a
Mac gets the Linux bindings, when they'd rather have the Mac ones.
Remapping each binding by hand via config is tedious, so add a single
LAZYGIT_KEYBINDING_PLATFORM override.
An unrecognized value falls back to the real OS rather than to the
non-darwin default bindings, since the latter would be an arbitrary
choice.
Lazygit runs git directly rather than through a shell, so a literal "~"
reaches `git worktree add` unexpanded and git creates a directory named
"~" instead of using the home directory.
Expand the tilde ourselves, both for paths typed into the "Other"
location prompt and for the worktree.defaultPath config value.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The command was renamed from "View worktree options" to "New worktree",
but its keybinding config key was still 'worktrees.viewWorktreeOptions'.
That name no longer matches the command, and the 'worktrees' section made
little sense: it held a single binding that isn't even used in the
worktrees panel (that panel uses universal.new), only in the branches,
remotes, tags, commits, and stash panels. Other keybinding sections are
named after the panel they're local to; this one wasn't local to any.
Move it to universal.newWorktree, which describes the action and drops the
spurious section, and migrate existing configs automatically.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The old flow forced an up-front "normal vs detached" menu (meaningless for
commits, tags and stashes), then asked the user to type a worktree path from
scratch — easy to get wrong, and ambiguous about what relative paths resolve
against. It also offered the same two actions everywhere regardless of what
was selected.
Replace it with per-context "Worktree" menus whose items imply the intent
(new branch + worktree, worktree for an existing branch, detached worktree),
each feeding a shared name -> location -> create pipeline. The location menu
offers candidate parent directories as absolute paths instead of a blank
field, and "Worktree for a branch" is disabled (with a reason) when that
branch is already checked out somewhere, rather than failing after the fact.
Each ref/commit panel binds 'w' in its own controller and calls the matching
typed entry point on the worktree helper, so which menu opens is decided
statically by the call site rather than by dispatching on a ref's dynamic
type. The three commit panels share one menu through BasicCommitsController;
there is no longer a shared worktree-options controller.
The worktrees-panel 'n' flow and its old core (NewWorktree /
NewWorktreeCheckout) are left untouched here so nothing is written and then
rewritten; they migrate, and the dead i18n strings get removed, in a
follow-up commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The redesigned worktree-creation flow never asks the user to type a path
from scratch; instead it offers candidate parent directories. Until a repo
has any linked worktrees to learn from, there's nothing to offer, so let
users seed that list with a configured default location.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`b` on a merge conflict is meant to keep both sides. With the diff3
conflict style git additionally renders the common ancestor between the
two sides, and the old ALL selection kept everything between the
outermost markers, dragging that ancestor into the resolved file.
Rename the selection from ALL to BOTH and restrict it to the top and
bottom hunks so the common base is dropped. Without the diff3 style
there is no ancestor section, so the behaviour there is unchanged.
The user-facing keybinding config was already named pickBothHunks; only
the internal enum, handler, translation and log string still said "all".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The status panel already binds the universal edit key to "edit config
file", but that's only reachable while the status panel is focused. Add
a dedicated global binding (alt+shift+c) so the config file can be
opened from anywhere.
OpenFile (`o`) is for opening a file as if it was double-clicked in
Finder/Explorer; this is useful for binary files like PNGs, but never
for text files. You want to edit them, and there's `e` for that.
This adds the user-facing surface for configuring the side panels: their
order, which ones are visible, and how tabs are grouped into panels. Each
entry is either a single panel name or a list of names sharing one panel
as tabs, mirroring how the Keybinding type accepts a scalar or a sequence;
the JSON schema restricts the names to the known set so editors can offer
completion and catch typos. The default reproduces today's layout exactly.
Validation rejects unknown or duplicated names, and requires the files,
branches, and commits panels to always be present: a lot of code focuses
those directly (e.g. after resolving a conflict or popping a stash), so
allowing them to be hidden would let that code focus a hidden panel.
Nothing reads the option yet; the layout still uses the hard-coded order.
Wiring follows in a later commit so the inert surface (and its generated
docs and schema) can be reviewed on its own.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two settings to control the upcoming background polling mechanism:
- git.autoDetectExternalChanges (default true) is the on/off switch, parallel to
autoFetch/autoRefresh
- refresher.externalChangeCheckInterval (default 2 seconds) is the poll cadence
Disabling is the bool's job, not a magic 0 interval, matching the existing
convention.
Not yet referenced by any code.
With more than a couple of pagers, having to cycle forward through all
of them to reach the previous one (or to back out of an accidental press
of `|`) is tedious. Add a second binding that cycles backward.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When cycling pagers, "Selected pager 2 of 3" gives no clue which pager
you landed on; with several configured you have to remember the order.
Include the pager's name in the toast instead.
The name is normally derived from the first word of the pager command,
but that isn't always enough: two entries can share a command but differ
in options (e.g. "delta" and "delta --side-by-side"), and an entry may
have no command at all (the default entry, or when using
useExternalDiffGitConfig). So add an optional `name` field that
overrides the derived name.
The message was also hardcoded in English; localize it while we're here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A pager (GIT_PAGER) formats the diff git produces, while
externalDiffCommand and useExternalDiffGitConfig change how git produces
the diff in the first place. They are different pipeline stages, not
alternatives, so combining them on one entry just pipes one through the
other and produces garbled output (e.g. delta trying to parse
difftastic's side-by-side output as a unified diff). The two external
mechanisms likewise conflict, with the explicit command silently
shadowing the git config one. Treat all three as mutually exclusive and
reject configs that set more than one on the same entry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
